How does Ukrainian syntax compare to other Slavic languages

Ukrainian syntax shares many features with other Slavic languages but also displays some distinctive traits. Like other Slavic languages, Ukrainian generally follows a subject-verb-object (SVO) order but with an atypically high variability of word order, which means the order can change significantly for emphasis, topic-focus articulation, or syntactic relations. This flexibility in word order is a common trait among Slavic languages including Polish, Bulgarian, and Russian.

Notably, Ukrainian syntax involves a rich system of cases (nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, instrumental, locative, and vocative), typical across Slavic languages. However, Ukrainian has specific morphological and prosodic features for vocative case forms, differing somewhat from Croatian and other Slavic languages in the use of endings and intonation.

Ukrainian also shows particular syntactic features in verbal government patterns, with some verbs having different requirements for prepositional usage compared to Polish, for example. Additionally, the verbal noun category in Ukrainian, bearing action meaning, functions somewhat differently than in South, West, and East Slavic languages, maintaining a strong aspectual meaning inherited from verbs.

In terms of microsyntactic phenomena—small syntactic units between lexicon and grammar—Ukrainian shares many traits with languages like Belarusian, Polish, and Russian but has particular nuances detectable through computational linguistic models.

Overall, Ukrainian syntax is characterized by a functional-categorical approach, where meaning drives the choice of syntactic forms, reflecting a richness in aspectual distinctions and word formation subsystems compared to some other Slavic languages.

Summary:

• Ukrainian shares flexible SVO word order typical of Slavic languages.
• Ukrainian has seven cases, with distinct morphological/prosodic vocative forms.
• Differences in verbal government and prepositional use versus Polish.
• Unique treatment of verbal nouns with aspectual semantics.
• Microsyntactic units show cross-Slavic similarities with language-specific nuances.
• Ukrainian grammar emphasizes a functional approach linking semantics and syntax.

These features distinguish Ukrainian among Slavic languages, combining general Slavic syntactic traits with unique morphological and functional distinctions. ^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}

References

• VOCATIVE VARIANTS IN THE CROATIAN AND UKRAINIAN LANGUAGES: MORPHOLOGICAL, PROSODIC FEATURES, FEATURES OF USE (compared to other Slavic Languages)

• Functional and grammatical peculiarities of Ukrainian verbal nouns with the meaning of action comparing to other Slavic languages

• Asyndetic Complementation in the Light of Explicative Syntax (Exemplified with Bulgarian, Polish and Ukrainian)

• Microsyntactic Unit Detection Using Word Embedding Models: Experiments on Slavic Languages

• Grammatical studies of the Ukrainian language in the context of slavic studies

• THE SYNTACTIC RELATIONSHIP OF GOVERMENT IN POLISH AND UKRAINIAN LANGUAGES (ON THE EXAMPLE OF VERBAL PHRASES)

• Formation of grammatical forms of full-meaning parts of speech in Ukrainian and Polish languages

• Syntax of Secondary Academic Texts in Various Fields of Scientific Knowledge: A Comparative Aspect (On the Material of English and Ukrainian Languages)

• Nomination of extramarital relations in the language of traditional folk culture (based on the material of Slavic languages and cultures in comparison with English)

• SOME FEATURES OF POLISH AND OTHER SLAVIC LANGUAGES IN CANADA

• Some properties of the Ukrainian writing system

• THE SYNTACTIC UNIT (FROM DEFINITION TO MODELLING)

• Diachronic Study of Lexisof the East Slavic Languages: the Problem of Allocation and Descriptionof Lexical-Semantic Paradigms

• The Grammar and Syntax Based Corpus Analysis Tool For The Ukrainian Language

• FEATURES OF WRITTEN LANGUAGE COMMUNICATION BY MEANS OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE (on the example of official-business, epistolary and conversational-functional styles)

• ALLOMORPHIC FEATURES OF STYLISTICALLY MARKED INVERTED SYNTACTIC MODELS (WITH REFERENCE TO ENGLISH AND UKRAINIAN FICTION TEXTS)

• Between Three Languages, Dialects and Forms of Mixed Speech: Dialect and Language Contacts in Ukrainian-Belarusian Transitional Area

• New Bulgarian, Polish, and Ukrainian phraseology and language corpora

• Regional Variants Of The Russian Literary Language: Situation In Sevastopol

• Lexical peculiarities of bukovinian dialects (on the material of the Yuzhynets dialect of Kitsman region of Chernivetska oblast’)

• Ukrainian biaspectuality: An instantiation of compositional aspect in a verbal-aspect language

• Western Region Variety of the Standard Ukrainian Language in the Interwar Period: A Review of Liudmyla Pidkuĭmukha’s Monograph “Mova Lʹvova, abo koly ĭ batiary hovoryly” (Kyiv: Klio, 2020, ss. 326)

• Lexico-semantic analysis of the verbs denoting debate in english and ukrainian

• On the question of the language behavior of Kyivans in sociolinguistic dimensions

• Slavic languages – “SVO” languages without SVO qualities?

• IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE EUPHONOMY RULES IN MODERN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE OF THE HUMANITARIAN PROFILE